#1999 CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON FULL#
#1999 CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON PRO#

#1999 CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON FULL#

As always, one benchmark doesn't tell the full story. So, one could say that Apple's high-performance cores could challenge Raptor Cove and Zen 4 cores when working at around 3.77 GHz, at least in this specific benchmark. Scoring 2,900 points in single-thread Geekbench 6 workload is good enough to challenge many desktop-class processors, but trails the fastest models by ~10%.

Of course, Apple's custom core is traditionally faster than those developed by Arm itself.

#1999 CPU BENCHMARK COMPARISON PRO#

That's a solid gain in value comparing Zen 4 to the previous Zen 3 architectures.As far as single-core performance of Apple's A17 Pro in Geekbench 6 is concerned, it is 10% faster than its predecessor, the A16 Bionic, which leads to a question regarding whether Apple introduced any microarchitectural CPU improvements with its latest SoC. Even the previous generation Ryzen 9 5950X (Zen3) performs well here, with sixteen full-sized cores, and not hybrid designed architectures like the Core i9-12900K.įocusing on the cheaper and more affordable Ryzen 5 7600X, it has similar levels of performance to the Ryzen 7 5800X in rendering it is worth reminding you that the Ryzen 5 7600X's MSRP is $150 cheaper than what the Ryzen 7 5800X launched for ($299 versus $449). Looking at the results of our new rendering tests, we can see that the AMD Ryzen 9 7950X reigns supreme. It seems that the more cores and threads that are being used, the more effective AMD's Zen 4 is at stretching its legs over Intel's Alder Lake.īelow is some testing from our upcoming CPU 2023 suite update, including an updated version of Blender (v3.3) with multiple tests, as well as a C-Ray benchmark. For comparison against Intel, it only beats the Core i9-12900K by 3% in the single-threaded section, but it's over 42% more effective in R23 MT performance which is very impressive. The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the uncontested fastest. Starting off with CineBench R23 which is one of the most popular benchmarks users rely on for judging performance, the 7950X is ahead by around 24% in the single-threaded test, and an astonishingly large 49 to 50% quicker in the multi-threaded test. In the battle of high-end AMD vs Intel CPUs, AMD's Ryzen 9 and Ryzen 7 families square off against Intel's Core i9 and Core i7 lineup. Renderingĭigesting the results of our rendering focused tests, and yeah, the Ryzen 9 7950X is an animal when it comes to multi-threaded rendering performance. We are using DDR5 memory on the Ryzen 9 7950X and Ryzen 5 7600X, as well as Intel's 12th Gen (Alder Lake) processors at the following settings:Īll other CPUs such as Ryzen 50 were tested at the relevant JEDEC settings as per the processor's individual memory support with DDR4. Most benchmarks in this case are re-run several times, and the key to this is having an appropriate idle/wait time between benchmarks to allow for temperatures to normalize from the last test. If a system is not properly configured to deal with the thermal requirements of the processor, the rendering benchmarks is where it would show most easily as the frequency drops over a sustained period of time. These tests are some of the most strenuous in our list, due to the highly threaded nature of rendering and ray-tracing, and can draw a lot of power. All the tests put out some sort of score or time, usually in an obtainable way that makes it fairly easy to extract. Rendering tests, compared to others, are often a little more simple to digest and automate.

1999 cpu benchmark comparison